Exam 4: The Law of Torts

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

An invitee is a person permitted by the occupier to enter the premises for business purposes,for example a shopper.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(79)

Which of the following is NOT a defence to a defamation action?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(89)

Prior to the legislative changes in Canada with respect to contributory negligence,if a plaintiff contributed in any way to her or his own loss the action would fail.Statutes now require courts to

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(80)

Explain the concept of absolute privilege and its application.

(Essay)
5.0/5
(90)

An occupier has no liability whatsoever to a trespasser.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(81)

Even a trespasser is owed a duty of common humanity.Explain.

(Essay)
4.7/5
(86)

What do we mean when we say that damage is remote?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(78)

Tort damages are often classified into

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(81)

For the most part,Canadian courts apply modified principles of negligence to determine liability.Some critics of fault-based systems propose that victims be compensated through "no-fault" government schemes-similar to those already in place relating to motor vehicle accidents and workers compensation.Others argue that the law should impose "strict liability" in all areas in which plaintiffs have traditionally struggled to establish fault,namely,against manufacturers of goods or products.Explain the three bases for awarding compensation to injured parties and the advantages and disadvantages of each.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(84)

A tort is

(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(84)

What is the difference between intentional torts and negligence?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(73)

An innocent employer is vicariously liable for the negligent acts of an employee.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(64)

An act of omission that is not found to be negligence today may later be found to be negligence.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(83)

Joe recently purchased a can of shaving cream from his pharmacy.After shaking the can as directed,Joe pushed the button on top.Suddenly and without warning,the can exploded causing serious injury to Joe.As a result of the explosion,the can of shaving cream was destroyed.In an action by Joe against the manufacturer,the following principle of law will apply

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(88)
Showing 61 - 74 of 74
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)