Exam 4: The Law of Torts

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

The purchaser of a bottled beverage is more likely to be successful in a suit for damages against the manufacturer as a result of becoming ill if

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(83)

A doctor makes a serious error during the course of diagnosing a patient.The patient subsequently dies.The deceased patient's family members bring a lawsuit against the doctor.All the experts who testify agree that the doctor failed to meet the standard of care but that if appropriate care had been provided,the patient would have died in any event.The family members' case against the doctor will

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(88)

How can the plaintiff's own conduct affect the outcome of a claim for negligence?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(81)

Most Canadian jurisdictions have now abolished the distinction between invitees and licensees.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(77)

In law,the concept of negligence continues to evolve,so that what was not negligence in the past may well become negligence in the future.Explain.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(81)

What is the difference between intentional torts and negligence?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(71)

What is meant by owing a "duty of care" in the tort of negligence?

(Essay)
4.8/5
(90)

What is contributory negligence?

(Essay)
4.8/5
(84)

James has been burgled several times.He is fed up and decides to do something about it.He places two traps at vantage locations in his home.One night he hears a scream and he runs down to find Bob,a local troublemaker,writhing in pain and holding his bleeding leg.Which of the following is NOT true?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(74)

After a manufacturer places a product on the market,it has a continuing obligation to warn consumers of potential dangers.

(True/False)
4.7/5
(79)

At what stage in a negligence action will the court apply the remoteness test?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(84)

During the early stages of the development of tort law,liability was

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(77)

Jack owns a pub.One evening,Jim,a friend,comes into the pub and orders a drink.Over a period of approximately two hours,Jim orders and drinks a variety of alcoholic beverages.Shortly before the pub closes,Jim pays for his drinks and leaves the pub.Jim gets into his car and drives away.On his way home,Jim is involved in a motor vehicle accident.Explain the nature of the tort that Jack would be found to have committed.Are there any defences available to Jack? Explain what these defences are.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(79)

Under strict liability,a wrongdoer is punished strictly if the wrongdoer was at fault.

(True/False)
5.0/5
(83)

The roots of a tree that is growing on one property and that continue to grow onto another property may constitute a nuisance.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(78)

Prior to the legislative changes in Canada with respect to contributory negligence,if a plaintiff contributed in any way to her or his own loss the action would fail.Statutes now require courts to

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(62)

For the most part,Canadian courts apply modified principles of negligence to determine liability.Some critics of fault-based systems propose that victims be compensated through "no-fault" government schemes-similar to those already in place relating to motor vehicle accidents and workers compensation.Others argue that the law should impose "strict liability" in all areas in which plaintiffs have traditionally struggled to establish fault,namely,against manufacturers of goods or products.Explain the three bases for awarding compensation to injured parties and the advantages and disadvantages of each.

(Essay)
4.8/5
(79)

An innocent employer is vicariously liable for the negligent acts of an employee.

(True/False)
4.7/5
(83)

What do we mean when we say that damage is remote?

(Essay)
4.8/5
(75)

The concept of foreseeability in tort law is considered by a court in determining the existence of a duty of care and as a threshold for the recovery of any damage suffered by an injured plaintiff.Explain the significance of "reasonably foreseeable" as it relates to both duty and damages,as well as the policy reasons why courts sometimes fail to recognize a duty,or fail to recognize that the plaintiff has met the threshold for recovery of damages.

(Essay)
4.8/5
(75)
Showing 41 - 60 of 77
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)