Multiple Choice
Mo owns a business that makes kites.Mo's agent Baez entered into an agreement with Val to purchase some land for a new kite factory.Mo's agency relationship with Baez was not memorialized by any writing.The day after Baez signs the papers finalizing the sale,Mo learned of the purchase,was furious with Baez,and wanted out of the deal.Assuming that Baez was legally considered the agent of Mo in making the purchase,which of the following is Mo's best argument?
A) That the agency agreement with Baez was not in writing and that under the equal dignities rule Mo should not be bound.
B) That agency agreements may not extend to the purchase of land.
C) That under the exclusion principle,Baez was not authorized to purchase land unless expressly authorized by Mo.
D) That Mo did not need land and therefore should not be bound because Baez was mistaken.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q53: An agent may bind the principal due
Q54: Apparent authority may be based on which
Q55: The most basic legal characteristic of the
Q56: Which of the following is an example
Q57: What is considered in determining the scope
Q59: The most common form of agency relationship
Q60: Which of the following are autonomous computer
Q61: The Electronic Signatures in Global and National
Q62: The "Inside Story" discussed the fiduciary rule
Q63: A principal may be held liable for