Multiple Choice
Citron v. Zundel, involved a Canadian human rights complaint involving an internet hate site. What did the Tribunal find?
A) Since no one person in particular was mentioned on the internet hate site, there is no case for defamation.
B) The tone of the messages on the website were so malevolent in its depiction of Jews, the Tribunal found them to be hate messages within the meaning of the Canadian Human Rights Act, but they were protected under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
C) The only recourse would be for the plaintiff to bring a defamation action against the defendant.
D) The messages on the website were considered free speech and thusly protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
E) The tone of the messages on the website were so malevolent in its depiction of Jews, the Tribunal found them to be hate messages within the meaning of the Canadian Human Rights Act.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Whether a contract or another form of
Q2: PayPal, and other similar services are foolproof
Q4: When a judgment is obtained against a
Q8: Which of the following statements regarding privacy
Q9: Discuss the Personal Information Protection and Electronics
Q10: Employment with respect to the internet is
Q11: While at work, Neil would spend a
Q101: Ontario's Consumer Protection Act specifically provides rights
Q108: Health information is not specifically protected by
Q132: In determining jurisdiction for electronic commerce,what factor