Multiple Choice
The court in Furlong v. Alpha Chi Omega Sorority held that:
A) the UCC did not apply to this situation.
B) the design specifications were part of the basis of the bargain and as such became an express warranty.
C) rejection of the goods was not rightful even though the sorority seasonably notified the seller within a reasonable time since notice was by phone.
D) the law required the sorority to accept Furlong's offer of compromise.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: If no place of tender is indicated
Q27: Tender can be made any time of
Q28: A buyer who sells rejected goods on
Q29: a. Distinguish between a rejection of goods
Q31: Revocation of acceptance requires notice to the
Q32: The perfect tender rule requires that the
Q33: If an anticipatory repudiation substantially impairs the
Q34: J & J Co. offers a "subscription"
Q35: A buyer in Atlanta enters into a
Q35: The buyer's rejection of nonconforming goods or