Multiple Choice
Stintson Corp. had agreed to create employee identity cards for McLaughlin Inc. for $60,000. Some of the cards delivered by Stintson Corp. had damages made during the lamination process. McLaughlin Inc. promised Stintson Corp. an additional $20,000 to replace the damaged identity cards, and Stintson Corp. did so. Then McLaughlin Inc. refused to pay Stintson Corp. more than $60,000 for the work. Which of the following statements is true of this situation?
A) Stintson Corp. is not entitled to any more than $60,000 for its work.
B) McLaughlin Inc. owes Stintson Corp. the additional $20,000.
C) Stintson Corp. would still be entitled only to $60,000 because such an act is new consideration that was provided to support the modification.
D) Stintson Corp. is entitled to the additional $20,000 as legal value has nothing to do with adequacy of consideration.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: Under section 2-209 of the Uniform Commercial
Q26: Explain what an illusory promise is and
Q27: Past consideration is sometimes accepted for _.<br>A)
Q28: Identify the correct statement regarding consideration.<br>A) A
Q29: Once a binding accord and satisfaction has
Q31: A liquidated debt is one that is
Q32: If the promisee agrees not to do
Q33: When a contracting party runs into unforeseeable
Q34: A promise to make a gift for
Q35: According to the rule of _, if