Multiple Choice
Able borrowed $10,000 from Baker,promising to return it with $1,000 interest on January 1,2006.There is no dispute that Able owes Baker $11,000 due on January 1,2006.On that day,Able gave Baker a valid check in the amount of $10,500 marked "payment in full for loan due January 1,2006." Baker accepted that check and deposited it into his account.If Baker then sues Able for the unpaid $500,what would the result be?
A) Able wins,because Baker accepted the lesser payment.
B) Able wins,because Baker made an implied promise to accept $10,500 as full payment,thereby forgiving $500 of the loan.
C) Baker wins,because Able gave no consideration in exchange for Baker's promise to forgive $500 of the loan.
D) Baker wins,because marking "payment in full" can never relieve a party of its original obligations under a contract.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: Mr.White contracts with his wife Ms.White to
Q8: In general,settlements of liquidated debts are not
Q9: Consideration can be a(n)_ in the case
Q10: The settlement of an unliquidated debt is
Q11: An agreement in which a party promises
Q13: In Day v.Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing,Inc. ,the case
Q14: Gift promises are not generally enforceable because
Q15: Why are "disguised gift" promises involving nominal
Q16: Nancy's car collides with Randy's truck at
Q17: Helen worked for ABC Motors for 25