Multiple Choice
Parsons,a pedestrian watching a construction project,sees that a metal beam being lifted by a crane is about to drop on some unsuspecting workers.Thus,he rushes to the scene to warn the workers.For his efforts,the falling beam strikes him.He sues the construction company for negligence.Which of the following is true? Assume that the falling beam was caused by a breach of duty on the construction company's part.
A) Parsons will recover against the construction company.
B) Parsons will recover,because construction companies are strictly liable for their employees' acts.
C) Parsons will not recover,because he knowingly and voluntarily assumed the risk of being struck by the beam.
D) Parsons will not recover,because he should have instead sued the worker operating the crane.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Unforeseeable acts are held to be an
Q2: Pam and Deb were in a car
Q4: _ is the omission to do something
Q5: In Lord v.D & J Enterprises,Inc. ,the
Q6: In the case in the text,Kesner v.Superior
Q7: The effort by legislatures to cap monetary
Q8: Negligence per se is defined as negligence
Q9: In a case involving an ultrahazardous or
Q10: Tom and Tim both negligently start their
Q11: Ann planned to hike into the woods.On