Bart and His Brother-In-Law, Ted, Owned a Small Corporation

Bart and his brother-in-law, Ted, owned a small corporation. Ted was basically an investor, and Bart ran the entire business. As Ted became increasingly remote from day-to-day operations, Bart began to falsify some records so that Bart could take a greater share of the profits. This continued for years with Bart mailing falsified financial statements to Ted. When Bart suddenly became ill, Ted was forced to assume a greater role in the business on a temporary basis. During this time, Ted discovered the past deceptions and sued Bart under Rule l0b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Bart defended on the procedural ground that the business was local and had never been involved in interstate transactions of any kind. Moreover, the corporation was not listed on any stock exchange, nor did it have assets in excess of $10 million or 500 or more shareholders. Comment on the outcome of this case.

Correct Answer:

Verified

Bart will be held liable because the rul...

View Answer

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

View Full Answer For Free