Which of the Following Correctly Uses an Explanatory Phrase for Subsequent

Which of the following correctly uses an explanatory phrase for subsequent case history when used in a pleading, motion, or case brief?

A) Big Horn County Elec. Co-Op v. Adams, 53 F.Supp.2d 1047 (D. Mont. 1999) , aff'd on other grounds, 219 F.3d 944 (9th Cir. 2000) .
B) Big Horn County Elec. Co-Op v. Adams, 53 F.Supp.2d 1047 (D. Mont. 1999) , aff'd on other grounds, 219 F.3d 944 (9th Cir. 2000) .
C) Big Horn County Elec. Co-Op v. Adams, 53 F.Supp.2d 1047 (D. Mont. 1999) , affirmed on other grounds, Big Horn County Elec. Co-Op v. Adams, 219 F.3d 944 (9th Cir. 2000) .
D) Big Horn County Elec. Co-Op v. Adams, 53 F.Supp.2d 1047 (D. Mont. 1999) ; 219 F.3d 944 (9th Cir. 2000) (aff'd on other grounds) .

Correct Answer:

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Access For Free