Multiple Choice
Peter Plaintiff was walking down the sidewalk next to Dagmar's Microbrewery. As he passed under an open window on the second floor of the brewery, Peter was hit by a falling barrel that caused serious injury to his head and arm. Peter filed a negligence action against Dagmar's Microbrewery. At trial, Dagmar's Microbrewery admits that the barrel was from the microbrewery and that Dagmar's Microbrewery owed a duty of care to others under negligence law. Peter also offers evidence of his injuries and medical expenses. Peter was unable to offer any other evidence. From the answer choices below, what additional evidence would be most helpful to completing Peter's negligence claim?
A) That the barrel was under the control of Dagmar's Microbrewery and that it fell as a result of an employee's carelessness.
B) That Dagmar's Microbrewery is responsible for the acts of its employees under the doctrine of respondeat superior.
C) That Dagmar's Microbrewery is the manufacturer and owner of the barrel.
D) That Dagmar's Microbrewery intended to use the barrel to store and transport its product.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: Janice is a transactional paralegal working for
Q8: A jurat is to a notary block
Q9: Joe is a paralegal who has worked
Q10: An ordinance is to a statute as
Q11: Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered to
Q13: Assumption of risk is to a negligence
Q14: A brown car ran a red light
Q15: Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of
Q16: Patti Paralegal works for an insurance defense
Q17: During a trial, the examination of witness