Multiple Choice
A certified paralegal worked in the litigation department of the Sakarov Law Firm. During that employment, the paralegal was heavily involved in several cases defending Mountainside All-Terrain Vehicles, Inc. against product defect claims arising from a brake problem. Three months ago, the paralegal took a job at the Hikado Law Firm, which handles plaintiff personal injury suits. Today, a conflict checking form was sent to all attorneys and paralegals in the Hikado Law Firm regarding a potential client and a claim against Mountainside All-Terrain Vehicles based on a faulty brake system. The paralegal sees the conflict check form, recognizes the name of the defendant, but says nothing. Has the paralegal violated any ethical or professional conduct rule?
A) Yes, because the rules governing certified paralegals require the paralegal to disclose the conflict with Mountainside All-Terrain Vehicles
B) Yes, because the Model Rules will impute the paralegal's prior work defending Mountainside All-Terrain Vehicles to all attorneys at Hikado Law Firm
C) No, because Hikado Law Firm has not yet accepted the case, and if it does, the paralegal can be screened to overcome any conflict of interest
D) No, because the conflict of interest rules under the Model Rules do not apply to non-attorney staff
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q48: Which of the following correctly describes a
Q49: A family law attorney was representing a
Q50: A certified paralegal must be familiar with
Q51: An attorney had been practicing in personal
Q52: Model Rule 1.8(e) prohibits lawyers from providing
Q54: After being charged with assault arising from
Q55: A family law attorney has a very
Q56: An attorney is representing the plaintiff in
Q57: Which of the following obligations apply to
Q58: A lawyer at a law firm called