Multiple Choice
Salman received information about stocks from Michael Kara, his future brother-in-law, who received inside information from Michael's brother, Maher Kara, who worked at Citigroup's investment banking group. Salman and Michael made numerous identical trades and earned significant income. Michael confessed to federal investigators. Salman was convicted of insider trading but contended that he was an innocent tippee who did not receive information directly from Maher who provided the tips and that Maher did not know he was receiving the information. The appeals court held that there was:
A) no evidence that Maher knew that either Michael or Salman was using the information, so there was no intent to engage in insider trading.
B) no evidence that Maher knew that Michael was passing information to Salman, so Salman was an innocent tippee.
C) evidence that Maher knew Michael was using the information but no evidence that he knew Salman obtained the information, so Salman was an innocent tippee.
D) evidence that Salman knew he received inside information so he was liable.
E) none of the other choices are correct.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q114: Securities issued by well-known seasoned issuers do
Q115: Chiarella worked at a company that printed
Q116: The CEO of Big Ships knows his
Q117: In City of Livonia Employees Retirement System
Q118: In SEC v. Howey, the Supreme Court:<br>A)
Q120: Securities are important to businesses because:<br>A) securities
Q121: The Supreme Court has ruled that for
Q122: Accredited investors, under SEC Regulation D for
Q123: The buying or selling of stock by
Q124: Officers of a company have a duty