Multiple Choice
Fact Pattern 17-1
Loretta worked for Minute Dry Cleaners as a cashier, and also did ironing when extra help was needed. Soon after she was hired, her boss, John, began to make suggestive comments to her. He complemented Loretta on her clothes and her looks. Several times, when they were in the store alone, John cornered Loretta and told her that she was driving him crazy, and that she just had to date him. Loretta told John that she already seeing someone and backed away.
John cornered her again. He told her that he had waited long enough, and that if she wanted to keep her job she was going to have to "put out." He grabbed her arm, but she got away to the counter. She told John to keep away from her. He laughed, and asked her what she was going to do. He said he knew she needed the job, because she was fired from her previous jobs for drug problems. If she didn't get along with him, he would fire her and tell people it was because she came to work stoned.
Loretta quit the next day. She filed a complaint against John with the local EEO office. John told EEO he fired Loretta was because of her drinking on the job. He referred them to Loretta's past work record which showed a drug problem. Loretta insisted that John harassed her and that she had not been drinking while at Minute.
-Refer to Fact Pattern 17-1. After Loretta notifies the EEO office of her complaint against John, the EEO will:
A) notify Minute Cleaners of the complaint and investigate Loretta's claims
B) sue Minute in the local district court based Loretta's claim
C) immediately issue a "right-to-sue" letter
D) issue an injunction against John barring him from working at Minute Cleaners
E) all of the other choices are possible
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q437: The first kind of employment discrimination to
Q438: A person may be covered by the
Q439: If an employer offers a pretext as
Q440: Under the common law employers were generally
Q441: An example of a disability covered by
Q443: Which of the following would not be
Q444: The four-part test that the plaintiff in
Q445: Ordering Spanish-speaking workers to speak English while
Q446: In U.S. v. Paradise, involving the hiring
Q447: Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights