Multiple Choice
Stark Excavating was replacing a fire hydrant. OSHA inspector Armstrong came to the worksite and saw that the sides of the hole where the hydrant was being installed were too steep, so the dirt might collapse. Stark knew the sides were steep but wanted to do the work quickly so as to avoid disruption to local businesses. Armstrong issued a "willful violation" citation. Start appealed that the citation should not be of such a serious nature. The appeals court held that the citation would be:
A) reduced to a lesser level because there was no injury on the worksite.
B) reduced to a lesser level because while the sides of the hole were steep it was only three feet deep so injury was very unlikely to occur.
C) eliminated because the inspector had no "conclusive evidence" that there could be harm, only speculation.
D) enforced as it was issued properly under the rules.
E) none of the other choices are correct.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q520: Most National Labor Relations Board cases concern
Q521: A(n) _ is one in which employees
Q522: Which of the following is not an
Q523: Which of the following statements may an
Q524: Which of the following is not subject
Q526: Workers who are injured at work due
Q527: The Landrum-Griffin Act provides for federal regulation
Q528: Key employees of an organization, such as
Q529: The National Labor Relations Act requires employers
Q530: If at least 30 percent of workers