Multiple Choice
In Orkal Industries v. Array Connector, where Orkal bought parts from Array by sending an order form, but Array confirmed with its own form that contained different terms. Orkal did not object to the different terms until litigation arose later at which point the added terms mattered. The courts held that under the UCC:
A) the buyer, Orkal, controlled the terms, so the original order form controls the contract
B) the buyer, Orkal, would have to provide new consideration for any change in the terms of the original contract
C) the seller, Array, controlled because Orkal's form contained major defects that made it fail as sufficient to create a contact
D) the seller, Array, controlled because under UCC 2-207, a sellers terms always control
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q289: A(n) _ is a statement or representation
Q290: The buyer's payment for the goods under
Q291: Venable bought a car from a dealer.
Q292: Under the UCC, a merchant is not
Q293: "Cover" is the profit a buyer expected
Q295: If a buyer rejects a shipment of
Q296: A warranty may be generally defined as:<br>A)
Q297: The UCC's remedies for breaches of contract
Q298: Article 2 of the UCC covers the
Q299: _ means that the good "must be