According to Zagzebski, Objections to Pascal's Wager Come from

Q46: Do you agree with Pascal that if

Q47: Anselm's argument appeals to facts about the

Q48: Zagzebski points out that you would never

Q49: If you are choosing between atheism as

Q50: Paley claims that a fish's eye is

Q52: According to Scriven, the theist must show

Q53: If God says actions are right because

Q54: Cleanthes offers an a priori argument for

Q55: Is it degrading to anthropomorphize God? Why

Q56: Nagel finds several theistic arguments convincing.