Multiple Choice
Determine whether the following statement is true or false: Although most-favored-nation (MFN) clauses in contracts between health plans and healthcare providers are not per se illegal, they should be reviewed under the rule of reason analysis for antitrust purposes.
A) True, because the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) ruled that MFN clauses are not per se illegal and the FTC encourages health plans to include them in provider contracts.
B) True, because although MFN clauses are not per se illegal, they violate antitrust laws if they have a predatory purpose and an anticompetitive effect.
C) False, because MFN clauses involve decisions by providers concerning the level of fees to charge, and thus they are per se illegal.
D) False, because MFN clauses are not per se illegal, and thus they are exempt from antitrust laws and regulation by the FTC.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: After conducting a business portfolio analysis, the
Q3: The Tidewater Life and Health Insurance Company
Q4: The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC)
Q5: SoundCare Health Services, a health plan, recently
Q6: States may impose nominal deductibles, coinsurance, or
Q7: Brighton Health Systems, Inc., a health plan,
Q8: Nightingale Health Systems, a health plan, operates
Q9: The Balanced Budget Act (BBA) of 1997
Q10: One provision of the Mental Health Parity
Q11: Any willing provider laws have their share