Multiple Choice
In considering a covenant not to compete in an employment contract, the court in the case of Payroll Advance, Inc. v. Yates said in its opinion:
A) in order to obtain an injunction it is necessary for the employer to show that actual damage has occurred.
B) covenants not to compete are presumptively valid, and they are enforceable to the extent they are reasonable.
C) the question of reasonableness of a restraint requires consideration of such circumstances as the subject matter of the contract, the purpose to be served, the situation of the parties, the extent of the restraint, and the specialization of the business.
D) a non-compete agreement over 2 years in length is never reasonable.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q29: The usual means of enforcing an agreement
Q39: A covenant not to compete is a
Q41: Specific lender usury statutes rather than the
Q46: Which statement is true about the limit
Q49: Edward, an engineer, is working on a
Q50: Which of the following would always be
Q52: An agreement for the purchase of an
Q53: Permissible lender's expenses, which would not be
Q55: Al, an accountant, has a tax service
Q56: Before granting an injunction enjoining a former