In Lawyer Disciplinary Board V

In Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Markins, the court held that

A) there was no ethics violation because Markins secretly accessed only his wife's emails.
B) clients had waived client-attorney confidentiality by including confidential information in emails.
C) Markins should be suspended for 2 years because surreptitiously accessing attorney emails violated ethics rules.
D) Markins should be prosecuted rather than being disciplined under attorney ethics rules.

Correct Answer:

Verified

Show Answer