Solved

Ariel Claims That a Pulse Is Described by the Equation

Question 81

Multiple Choice

Ariel claims that a pulse is described by the equation Ariel claims that a pulse is described by the equation   where x and y are measured in cm and t in s. Miranda says that it is not possible to represent a pulse with this function because a wave must be a function of x + vt or x − vt. Which one, if either, is correct, and why? A)  Ariel, because x<sup>2</sup> - 6.0xt + 9t<sup>2</sup> = (x - 3.0t) <sup>2</sup>. B)  Ariel, because a pulse is not an infinite wave. C)  Miranda, because (x - 3.0t) <sup>2</sup> is the same as (3.0t - x) <sup>2</sup>. D)  Miranda, because a pulse is not an infinite wave. E)  Miranda, because   is infinite when x = 0. where x and y are measured in cm and t in s. Miranda says that it is not possible to represent a pulse with this function because a wave must be a function of x + vt or x − vt. Which one, if either, is correct, and why?


A) Ariel, because x2 - 6.0xt + 9t2 = (x - 3.0t) 2.
B) Ariel, because a pulse is not an infinite wave.
C) Miranda, because (x - 3.0t) 2 is the same as (3.0t - x) 2.
D) Miranda, because a pulse is not an infinite wave.
E) Miranda, because
Ariel claims that a pulse is described by the equation   where x and y are measured in cm and t in s. Miranda says that it is not possible to represent a pulse with this function because a wave must be a function of x + vt or x − vt. Which one, if either, is correct, and why? A)  Ariel, because x<sup>2</sup> - 6.0xt + 9t<sup>2</sup> = (x - 3.0t) <sup>2</sup>. B)  Ariel, because a pulse is not an infinite wave. C)  Miranda, because (x - 3.0t) <sup>2</sup> is the same as (3.0t - x) <sup>2</sup>. D)  Miranda, because a pulse is not an infinite wave. E)  Miranda, because   is infinite when x = 0. is infinite when x = 0.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions