Multiple Choice
In CASE 6.1Free Enterprise Fund v.Public Company Accounting Oversight Board(2010) before the U.S.Supreme Court,the plaintiffs brought various constitutional challenges involving the appointment and standards for removal of members of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.How did the Court rule and why?
A) That limitations on the removal of Board members contravened the Constitution's separation of powers and that the unconstitutional provisions were not severable from the remainder of the statute.
B) That limitations on the removal of Board members contravened the Constitution's separation of powers but that the unconstitutional provisions were severable from the remainder of the statute.
C) That limitations on the removal of Board members were constitutional.
D) That limitations on the removal of Board members were constitutional only so long as the executive branch failed to challenge the restrictions placed on the president.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: The general rule is that agency action
Q18: Which of the following agencies was created
Q19: A formal administrative adjudication does not include
Q22: The Internal Revenue Service needs specific cause
Q23: Brianna is in charge of new federal
Q25: Administrative agencies have subpoena power to make
Q26: Actions of administrative agencies often affect businesses
Q32: A final agency rule is codified and
Q52: Failure to comply with regulations set in
Q54: A court will require an agency to