Multiple Choice
Rex,a licensed contractor,rented a heavy duty brush cutter from YouRentAll Inc.Within the first few minutes of use,the blade came off and extensively damaged the shroud and housing of the machine.It was determined that the bolts that held the blade on were left loose by some previous user.YouRentAll sued Rex for the repair costs,claiming Rex should have checked out the machine before using.Assuming the lease contract did not speak to this type of situation,how would the court rule?
A) The plaintiff would win,since there is an implied condition here.
B) The defendant would win,since there is an implied warranty of fitness.
C) The plaintiff would win,since they are in the business of renting chattels.
D) The defendant would win,because lessor needs to take care of all repairs.
E) The plaintiff would win,because proper standard of care was not shown.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q13: Quincy owns a metal fabricating company.He is
Q14: In both chattel leases and bailment,ownership remains
Q15: When can a warehousing firm that has
Q16: A leases a harvesting machine from B
Q17: A bailor is better off on the
Q19: Marcus rented some scaffolding to aid in
Q20: The transfer of possession of personal property
Q21: The majority of chattel leases are merely
Q22: A bailee (a hotel)is liable for damage
Q23: Define Bailment.