Multiple Choice
A ninety-year-old patient walked away from a nursing home and wandered onto some nearby railroad tracks.Once on the tracks,the patient stumbled and sprained his ankle.A few minutes later a train approached.The engineer saw the man on the track and could have stopped,but the train's brakes were defective.As a result,the train hit and killed the man.His family is suing the railroad for negligence.In this case:
A) the patient has assumed the risk of wandering onto the railroad tracks.
B) because the patient was contributorily negligent,most states would hold that the railroad has no liability.
C) in states that follow the contributory negligence rule,the train had the last clear chance to avoid the accident,so the patient's negligence does not bar his estate's recovery.
D) the train's striking of the man was an intervening cause,so the railroad company was strictly liable.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q80: What is the difference between contributory negligence
Q81: The general rule in negligence is that
Q82: Chris was driving a car with defective
Q83: Henry was burning leaves in his backyard.One
Q84: Conduct on the part of the plaintiff
Q85: In the majority of states,in a case
Q86: A defendant will be liable for all
Q87: Which of the following is/are considered in
Q89: A widely applied test for causation in
Q90: In which of the following situations would